Inflammatory Arthritis of the Foot

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Epidemiology

  • Presents in middle age
  • More common in women

Aetiology

  • Symmetric inflammatory polyarthropathy
  • Affects smaller joints more → forefoot > hindfoot

Pathoanatomy

  • Synovitis is the hallmark and is caused by:
    • Infiltration with Macrophages, B Lymphocytes & Monocytes
    • Inflammatory cytokines released – TNF-α, IL-6, IL-7
  • RANKL activates osteoclasts → biologic bone erosions
  • Pannus (fibrotic granulation tissue) causes mechanical erosions
  • Rheumatoid factor positive in 2/3 of patients

Markers of Severity

  • Presence of Rheumatoid factor
  • Extraarticular manifestations
    • Most common are Rheumatoid nodules

Foot and Ankle Problems

Forefoot

  • Most affected in RA
  • Common pathologies:
    • Hindfoot arthritis
    • Posterior Tibial Tendon arthritis
    • Ankle arthritis
  • Disease primarily affects lesser toe MTPJs
  • Synovitis causes capsular and collateral ligament destruction
  • HyperextensionMTPJ subluxation & dislocation
  • Valgus deviation at MTPJs
  • Plantar plates pulled distally → atrophy of plantar fat pad
  • Exposure of metatarsal heads causes metatarsalgia
  • Clawing of the toes → overpowering by FDL and intrinsic muscles
  • Hallux Valgus (HV) is common
    • HV is severe due to deviation of lesser toes
    • Splayfoot with bunionette deformity may also occur

Hindfoot and TP Tendinopathy

  • Occurs in about 25% of RA patients (usually after forefoot deformities)
  • Typical deformity: Pes Planovalgus
  • Caused by:
    • Subtalar erosions and eversion
    • Unlocked and synovitic Mid-Tarsal Joints
    • Synovitic Spring ligament
    • Arch collapse → Talar head plantar, navicular subluxates laterally
    • Tibialis Posterior Tendon prone to synovitis, attenuation, and rupture

Ankle

  • Severe erosions occur, though ankle is not usually unstable
  • When deformity occurs, it is valgus
    • Due to subtalar joint valgus and pes planus deformity

Medical Management

Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

  • Methotrexate
    • Most commonly used as the ‘anchor’ drug
  • Prednisolone
  • Hydroxychloroquine
  • Cyclosporin

TNF-α Antagonists (Biologic DMARDs)

  • Etanercept – Best tolerated
  • Infliximab
  • Adalimumab – Best disease suppression

DMARDs and Surgery

  • DMARDs reduce joint disease → less surgical intervention required
  • Perioperative DMARD Use:
    • Stopping DMARDs increases risk of RA exacerbation
    • Continuing DMARDs increases risk of infection & delayed healing
    • General recommendation: Stop TNF-α antagonists for 1-5 half-lives (5-15 days) before surgery

Surgical Management

Forefoot

1st MTPJ Options

  • FusionGold standard for HV in RA
  • Keller procedure (excision arthroplasty & soft tissue repair)
    • Option for older patients (quicker results, lower morbidity)
  • Arthroplasty
  • Joint-preserving osteotomy likely to fail due to soft tissue incompetence

Lesser Toes Options

  • MT head excision arthroplasty
    • Plantar or dorsal transverse incision or multiple longitudinal dorsal incisions
  • PIPJ fusion or excision arthroplasty with temporary wire stabilization
  • Stainsby procedure
    • Unstable toes, unsightly appearance

Hindfoot

  • Triple fusionGold standard treatment
  • Higher rate of non-union and malunion than OA
  • Good symptom relief
  • Some surgeons treat pes planovalgus like non-rheumatoids using isolated fusions, soft tissue reconstruction, or osteotomy
  • Risk: Progressive arthritis in other joints → deformity recurrence

Ankle

Synovectomy

  • 80% 10-year success rate across all joints
  • Good option for young patients, early disease, no deformity
  • Less common now due to DMARDs

Ankle Fusion

  • Gold standard treatment with long-term success
  • Arthroscopic fusion with percutaneous screws preferred
    • Shorter surgery time
    • Quicker fusion
    • Fewer soft tissue complications
  • Traditionally, deformity & equinus were contraindications for arthroscopic fusion
  • Current thinking:
    • Mild deformity & non-plantigrade foot may still be suitable
    • Bone resection required arthroscopically – technically difficult
Open Fusion
  • Very effective operation with good results
  • Approaches: Anterior, posterior, lateral, or combined
  • Screw Configuration
    • 3 screws more stable than 2
    • Cross screws more stable in lab studies

Ankle Replacement

  • Newer-generation replacements have longer survivorship
  • Survival rates:
    • Swedish Registry: 70% at 10 years
    • Wrightington: 93% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years
  • Good option for older, low-demand RA patients
    • Improved ROM
    • More normal gait pattern
    • Possible reduced adjacent joint arthritis (not proven)
  • Best option for pantalar arthritistriple fusion + ankle replacement
  • Much better than pantalar fusion for patients
Back to top